GPS Tracking Disputes and Legal Remedies in Custody Conflicts

GPS tracking disputes: A Modern Custody Conflict

It was a rainy Wednesday afternoon when Sarah got a notification on her phone: “Your child has left the designated GPS zone.” She had installed a GPS tracker on her 10-year-old son, Ethan, to find peace of mind in a tense custody battle with her ex-husband, Mark. That afternoon, however, the device felt more like an intrusion—a stark reminder of how quickly their conflict was spiraling.

Sarah raced to her car, her mind preoccupied with Mark. He had always been tech-savvy, and although they initially agreed on the GPS tracker to ease mutual anxieties, the divorce unleashed his penchant for weaponizing technology. Accusations flew, with Mark insisting Sarah was overstepping by spying on Ethan.

When Mark hacked into the tracking app and falsified data to show Ethan wandering outside agreed-upon zones, he filed an emergency custody motion against Sarah, claiming the tracker endangered their child. The courtroom lit up with fierce arguments over whether the device was a protective measure or a form of surveillance.

Worse, Sarah discovered Mark had also tracked her movements through the same app. The sense of betrayal was immediate, and she felt she’d lost control over her own privacy. Now technology, once introduced as a safety net, became the dividing line in a bitter custody clash.

In court, Mark’s lawyer argued the tracker undermined Ethan’s emotional well-being, while Sarah’s attorney pointed out that it was meant for safety rather than control. Caught in the crosshairs of a rapidly evolving tech landscape, the judge had to parse a dispute that blurred the line between responsible parenting and digital intrusion.

Ultimately, Sarah realized that her initial intention—protecting Ethan—morphed into a legal minefield. She felt powerless in a setting where technology seemed to overshadow reason. A once-innocent decision became a cautionary tale about the delicate balance between security and surveillance in family disputes.

Preventing GPS Tracking Conflicts: Lessons Learned

Sarah and Mark’s struggle underscores the dangers of mishandling technology in custody battles and points to key strategies for avoiding similar pitfalls.

1. Establish Clear Communication: Discuss the tracker’s purpose, set boundaries for its use, and determine who can access the data. This helps avoid misunderstandings and abuse.
2. Use Secure and Trusted Technology: All GPS devices are not created equal. Seek ones with strong security measures, such as encryption and two-factor authentication, to reduce hacking vulnerabilities.
3. Set Boundaries and Usage Agreements: A formal agreement covering when the tracker is activated, who has access, and what limitations exist can serve as a legal checkpoint.
4. Seek Professional Guidance: A family law attorney well-versed in technology’s role in custody cases can provide nuanced advice and draft binding terms regarding digital tools. Mediation can also resolve disputes before they erupt.
5. Educate on Cybersecurity Risks: Parents who learn about digital threats—and how to address them—are less likely to fall victim to hacking or misuse.
6. Encourage Emotional Intelligence: Building conflict-resolution skills can help both parents discuss tech usage productively. Keeping the child’s best interests in mind should remain front and center.
7. Monitor and Review Usage Regularly: Periodic reviews of the tracker’s data and function can stave off abuses. A quick check-in can reveal brewing conflicts before they escalate.

Sarah and Mark’s saga is not unique. As technology further intertwines with custody arrangements, it can serve both as a shield and a weapon. Clear, consistent communication, a commitment to strong cybersecurity, and a deliberate legal framework are vital to ensuring that digital tools protect families instead of fueling disputes.

The court ultimately ruled in Sarah’s favor, but her victory was bittersweet. Though she retained custody, she lost trust in the technology she once saw as protective, and her fraught relationship with Mark grew worse. The moral of her story is that GPS tracking can offer safety but can just as easily cross the line into harmful surveillance. Thoughtful use of these tools is essential; otherwise, technology intended to safeguard children may become a new front in custody warfare.

Related Articles

• Limiting Intrusive Background Checks by Opposing Counsel in Family Law: A Case Study
• Protecting Children'S Personal Data During Divorce Proceedings
• Using Encrypted Messaging Services In High-Conflict Family Cases

Written by Jonathan D. Steele

Chicago divorce attorney with cybersecurity certifications (Security+, ISC2 CC, Google Cybersecurity Professional Certificate). Illinois Super Lawyers Rising Star 2016-2025.

Free Case Assessment

For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.